Concerns about border security and terrorism drive government surveillance initiatives, says report
from ASSOCIATED PRESS
LONDON - Individual privacy is under threat in the United States and across the European Union as governments introduce sweeping surveillance and information-gathering measures in the name of security and border control, an international rights group said in a report. Greece, Romania and Canada posted the best privacy records in a survey by the London-based watchdog Privacy International, which assessed the state of surveillance and privacy protection in 47 countries.
Malaysia, Russia and China were ranked worst, along with Singapore.
‘The general trend is that privacy is being extinguished in country after country,’ said Privacy International director Simon Davies.
‘Even those countries where we expected ongoing strong privacy protection, like Germany and Canada, are sinking into the mire.’
In terms of statutory protections and privacy enforcement, the US is the worst-ranking country in the democratic world. In terms of overall privacy protection, it performed very poorly as well.
US President George W. Bush’s administration has come under fire for its domestic wire-tapping programme, which allows warrantless monitoring of international telephone calls and e-mail involving people suspected of having terrorist links.
‘The last five years have seen a litany of surveillance initiatives,’ Mr Davies said.
He said little had changed since the Democrats took control of Congress a year ago.
‘We would expect the cancellation of some programmes, the review of others, but this hasn’t occurred,’ Mr Davies said.
The worst-ranking EU country is the United Kingdom, which fell into the ‘endemic surveillance’ category along with Russia and Singapore.
Britain was criticised for its plans to introduce national identity cards, a lack of government accountability, and the world’s largest network of surveillance cameras. 
Mr Davies said the loss earlier this year of computer disks containing personal information and bank details of 25 million people in Britain highlighted the risks of centralising information in huge government databases.
Along with the US and Britain, some of the countries with the least privacy protection, such as the Philippines, are also considered at risk of terrorist attacks.
The correlation with terrorist threats, however, is unclear. Ireland, Spain and Germany, which have been victims of terrorist attacks, scored better than relatively calmer countries such as Norway and Sweden.
The 1,100-page report released on Saturday said privacy protection was worsening across western Europe, although it was improving in the former communist states of eastern Europe.
Surveillance initiatives initiated by the EU headquarters in Brussels have caused a substantial decline in privacy across Europe, eroding protections even in those countries that have shown a traditionally high regard for privacy.
The privacy performance of older democracies in Europe is generally failing, while the performance of newer democracies is becoming generally stronger, said the report.
It also said concern about terrorism, immigration and border security was driving the spread of identity and fingerprinting systems, often without regard to individual privacy.
The report said the trends ‘have been fuelled by the emergence of a profitable surveillance industry dominated by global IT companies and the creation of numerous international treaties that frequently operate outside judicial or democratic processes’.
The survey considered a range of factors including legal protection of privacy, enforcement, data sharing, the use of biometrics, and the prevalence of CCTV cameras.
The 47 countries surveyed were put in five categories, from the best - countries with ‘adequate safeguards against abuse’ - to the worst - ‘endemic surveillance societies’.
————–

When I discovered the above article here, I felt I just had to share it with you all. It seems to be such a contrast to the article praising Singapore for attracting foreign owned businesses and IPOs that I posted here a few days ago.
Performing a google search on “surveillance centre” almost the first result back was for a UK operation, openly advertising on the Internet and nestling in a full page of results for communicable disease surveillance units (
I’m saying nothing about that juxtaposition) ….
standby, standby, standby….
The Surveillance Centre.
Providing a complete service for individuals, enforcement, compliance and investigation agencies and commercial organisations wishing to engage in covert surveillance activities for purposes of fact finding, information development, intelligence collection or evidence gathering of a legitimate nature.
….our operations go unnoticed by design
….we practice discretion as an art
….we are committed to high performance
….our results are compelling |
If you read their “About” page, it reads like a “what’s what” of everything you hoped would never enter your business life, although the “counter surveillance training” sounds intriguing
… it also sounds like a way to create a self-perpetuating market. Or, is it all just pandering to the paranoid?
- “in this classroom we teach you how to spy on the competition, and in that one, we teach them howe to find out if you’re doing it. This means you will have to come back next year to upgrade your spying skills, but of course they’ll be coming back to improve their spycatching skills, so you’ll then need to come back again …..” etc etc.
Nice customer loyalty, if you can get it.
Another quick google led me to www.hiddenpinholecameras.com who have got lots of “toys” and “toys detectors” to play with, in fact I could happily spend a few hours learning about the whole surveillance and counter-surveillance technology game, if I had the time to spare. Maybe I’ll have a nosy under the guise of checking out their web technology for posting in our forums IT sections
any excuse huh?
Be good - you never know who’s watching, or listening, and remember the WW2 slogan - “Walls have ears”. Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean there’s no-one out to get you.
Ed